BTW I watched Glenn's report. For the most part, we are saying the same thing:
The presidents in the past have had immunity - and its not a good thing - and now its been codified by the SCOTUS. Glenn spends too much time downplaying Trumps potential to use the power, but we both are saying that presidents have immunity and SHOULD NOT.
What would happen to you if government spent over 50 million going after you. No one has went easy on Trump. Especially social engineered ppl like you!
Trump is a legit threat to liberty. But he says just enough things to convince people like you that he is not an actor. Then the corporate media and obviously corrupt politicians attack him so people like you assume that must mean he's on "our side" if he is "under attack".
The whole time not realizing what you are watching is the 5th Generation Warfare I spoke about in my last post.
Do something constructive for once. Tell me about pedojoe and how great you think he is instead of showing bias to Trump that has had 50 million dollars of tax money spent going after him.
I see it as well, but I have sympathy for anyone that has had to deal with the criminals in government using color of law to go after.their enemies. That leaves all of us in danger.
Scotus made right decision. Criminals that run government are using color of law to go after their enemies!
and what do you think giving a president nearly complete immunity will empower them to do but turn around and do the same thing to their "enemies"?
If you don't give immunity, anyone can go after potus for any reason, which makes it impossible for him to do his job. Common sense!
good. Presidents are criminals. If they couldn't do their jobs, even better!
Watch what Glenn Greenwald says about it.
BTW I watched Glenn's report. For the most part, we are saying the same thing:
The presidents in the past have had immunity - and its not a good thing - and now its been codified by the SCOTUS. Glenn spends too much time downplaying Trumps potential to use the power, but we both are saying that presidents have immunity and SHOULD NOT.
So who would take a job that subjects him to legal jeopardy? Your answer is the ability to go after any one you don't like. Your a genius. ЁЯдг
No, the answer is not to let human beings be above the law, even if they have a title like "president", "police officer", or "diplomat".
I know what these folks are saying bc they are going easy on Trump. It's all by design.
What would happen to you if government spent over 50 million going after you. No one has went easy on Trump. Especially social engineered ppl like you!
Trump is a legit threat to liberty. But he says just enough things to convince people like you that he is not an actor. Then the corporate media and obviously corrupt politicians attack him so people like you assume that must mean he's on "our side" if he is "under attack".
The whole time not realizing what you are watching is the 5th Generation Warfare I spoke about in my last post.
Do something constructive for once. Tell me about pedojoe and how great you think he is instead of showing bias to Trump that has had 50 million dollars of tax money spent going after him.
Attacking Biden is low hanging fruit. He's obviously a puppet, but clearly people have drank the cool-aid on Trump.
I don't support either puppet. Some of us see past the two party lie.
I see it as well, but I have sympathy for anyone that has had to deal with the criminals in government using color of law to go after.their enemies. That leaves all of us in danger.
again, you are trusting the narrative being shown to you as facts.
What narrative do you say I'm trusting? If it conflicts with yours, why is yours valid?
the narrative that Trump is a good guy under attack.
You assume. I never said Trump was a good guy! I object to government persecution of anyone