Call me if you have my cell #. If you don't, pm me on Fascistbook and I'll provide it. I'd love to get together with you while you're in Houston if you have time. I'll drive in.
I wish UK MHRA would have said that to me back in Dec 2020. A lot of people would still be alive. For publishing the emails I was thrown off Twitter, Facebook and Discord. I am completely deplatformed over this. Even here, on Substack.
I get trolled all the time too. We all do. I think the wisest way to handle it is to keep engaging until we finally thrash out what really happened and how to avoid anything like this happening again. I am glad you enjoyed Bath. It is a gorgeous city. Thanks for the positive mention for activism in the UK.
That's just plain insincere, Derrick. Your description of the 'no virus' debate is a gross mischaracterization. Nobody who knows the subject is saying that because SARS-CoV2 hasn't been isolated that means no viruses exist, and nobody is saying it means it's "all terrain theory". You're mixing issues that are completely separate, and making nonsense.
The 'maybe Cowan and Kaufman aren't real doctors' part is absurd. Maybe you should check into it, if it's an issue for you. But yes, they were both 'real' doctors, unlike most of the other's you've interviewed to ask about this subject. And if Cowan and Kaufman weren't medical doctors, would that mean they're wrong or would have less credibility? Popularity and establishment credentials mean truth, to you?
What's absent from you from the beginning on this topic is the willingness to use reason, and figure out who's telling the truth. And you display an obvious emotional bias to believe the Rockefeller medicine story about viruses, along with the crowd. Why not just admit feeling a strong bias and that you don't want to actually look at the science? That would be a sincere place to start.
Nobody who's really done the research on the side of virus truth is trying to bully anyone into just accepting the reality that no virus has ever been proven to exist. It's a call for reason, for science, and for truth, nothing else. You're taking the Kirsh approach and trying to steer the issue to being a popularity contest, in which truth always loses.
"Nobody who knows the subject is saying that because SARS-CoV2 hasn't been isolated that means no viruses exist, and nobody is saying it means it's "all terrain theory""
Actually, that is what many people say. This is the claim of so many other researchers who say viruses do not exist at all. I am not sure if you are seeing the same comments or videos I am, but I've heard that claim many times.
"The 'maybe Cowan and Kaufman aren't real doctors' part is absurd"
My comment wasnt about them specifically but the explosion of claimed doctors in the msm and in the independent media. I dont trust someone simply bc they have letters next to their name. No one should. I dont think thats controversial.
"And you display an obvious emotional bias to believe the Rockefeller medicine story about viruses, along with the crowd."
Show a statement or video where I prefer "rockefeller medicine". Make sure to include the Pyramid of Power episode where I specifically debunk and expose Rockefeller Medicine. However, that doesnt mean buying the claims of the no virus crowd wholesale.
"Nobody who's really done the research on the side of virus truth is trying to bully anyone into just accepting the reality that no virus has ever been proven to exist."
That's your opinion and that's fine, but my comments online and emails (and others' channels) show different. There are lists being made about those of us who are falsely accused of shilling rockefeller medicine (as you say) and trying to make this a divisive issue. I dont think it needs to be and I dont see it as the most important topic. End of story.
Who among the legitimate researchers of virology, who've looked at the scientific research and have concluded that no one has ever isolated a virus, are saying that the lack of SARS-CoV2 isolation proves there's no viruses? Provide one citation.
You continue to misrepresent and confuse issues, and as you persist in doing this it appears increasingly that it's intentional.
What Kaufman, Cowan, the Baileys, Lanka, and those associated with them do say is that they've looked at the past century of virology research and concluded that no one has legitimately, scientifically isolated any virus. That conclusion in no way comes from only looking at SARS-CoV2, as you've been claiming. Likewise, terrain theory has absolutely nothing to do with the lack of virus isolation; you're just adding more confusion.
You did specifically target your 'maybe they're not real doctors' comment at Cowan and Kaufman. Why didn't you mention that maybe people should question the credibility of Mercola, Fitts, Bigtree, and Corbett? Why didn't you ask them if they've actually read and understand the past century of virology research, so that your viewers know that you're soliciting uninformed opinions?
Virus theory and germ theory are the core of Rockefeller medicine. Establishing the fraudulent pseudo-science of virology was part of the core mission of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, set up by Rockefeller and Gates in 1901 in order to monopolize medicine around warring against nature and peddling toxic chemicals touted as health-care. If you're defending virus theory, you're largely defending Rockefeller medicine.
I don't care that you've had your mind made up from the beginning on this issue, and have no intention of sincerely investigating the science. What I do care about is your dishonest attempts to smear good people who have investigated the science, attempting to lead your viewers in that direction as well.
I'm attempting to discover if Derrick Broze has the character to get honest, and stop the BS campaign.
"Why didn't you mention that maybe people should question the credibility of Mercola, Fitts, Bigtree, and Corbett? "
Other than Mercola they dont claim to be doctors. That's the difference.
Look, I am not trying to argue. So chill the fuck out and breathe once or twice before typing up shit. I am not going to spend my precious time playing this game again with people who already have their mind made up.
In fact, behavior like this just pushes me away further from this crowd online.
You blatantly distort what Cowan, Kaufman and others say about virus isolation to insinuate that their position isn't rational, and when called on it you continue with the games and distort and deflect what I write. You didn't sincerely address a single of the questions I posed to you. Each of your responses avoids the points I've made.
"Behavior like this" is simply calling you on your misrepresentation and manipulation with hope that you'd get real. You poor victim.
I've been aware of your Freedom Cell work for years, and have loved seeing it. I wasn't wanting to find such an insincere response.
The first 12 minutes of your video is full of BS that misrepresents these people. Sure, you don't plainly say it. You do it with innuendo, like a sleazy mainstream 'journalist', so you can deny what you're doing.
I really didn't understand why you've had such a difficult time with the leaders of the virology truth movement, who are all very intelligent and courageous people, and none of them looking for a fight. Now I see why.
And I can see that you intend to continue undeterred, while never addressing the real issue; the honest science.
You interview people, but don't know (and verify) their credentials? Uhm ... this speaks volumes about you and your "research". You ask financial experts about whether or not viruses exist? Okay. Makes sense - don't believe medical doctors, but take the word of those who are in other trades. LOL.
Feel free to take anything out of context if you like. I know the credentials of the people I interview, I simply dont have them in front of me in this video. My comments were not about Cowan or Kaufman specifically, but the broader movement of doctors who have popped up in the MSM and in independent media. I am not blindly trusting of them just because they have a title next to their name or a lab coat on.
BTW none of the people who are speaking out as doctors as virologists.
By politics, I mean that instead of looking at the points made about virology, you instead focus on who is questioning it. Funny, that's the kind of thinking that the mass media promotes.
Mentioning that you don't see virologists challenging things, just remember this quote. It helps me understand why corruption persists, the system doesn't pay for the truth.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ― Upton Sinclair,
Check this study out about the Spanish flu. They tried many methods to pass it from sick people to healthy ones... A surprise ending to read
I'm just a bit frustrated that you know of his work, yet ignore the implications of his study.
Think about it again. If you get the same results from a culture with and without a virus, what does that tell you about the method and what viruses really are?
I'm not saying the people attacking you in the comments are on payroll, but if I was paying people to cause in-fighting and division this is exactly what I would instruct them to do
I'm really shocked by the nasty attacks on Broze below. No tact whatever.
I corrrespond with a very clever and knowledgeable man on substack and If I disagree I wouldn't dream of calling his ideas shit. I question and try out some of my ideas to see what he thinks.
Broze didn't get quite to the trans issue here. There has been a lot of hysteria on this subject and I am bored by it. People should be allowed to be what they want to be.
I am vaguely aware that some LGBTers try to work nasty politics into their status. They should be ignored
Call me if you have my cell #. If you don't, pm me on Fascistbook and I'll provide it. I'd love to get together with you while you're in Houston if you have time. I'll drive in.
Thanks Derrick for raising the issue of Virus vs No Virus. I thought you would like to see my email exchange with UK MHRA. It may be helpful.
The SARSCov2 genetic sequence quoted to the W.H.O. was created in a laboratory COMPUTER. It never existed in reality. This is known as 'in silico'.
UK MHRA confirmed this in December 2020 but chose to approve Pfizer's vaccine based upon that computer recombinant genome.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sarscov2-mrna-is-synthetic
I am aware of the computer modeling. Again, I've looked at most of the data being presented to me. I know COVID19 is a lie.
I wish UK MHRA would have said that to me back in Dec 2020. A lot of people would still be alive. For publishing the emails I was thrown off Twitter, Facebook and Discord. I am completely deplatformed over this. Even here, on Substack.
I get trolled all the time too. We all do. I think the wisest way to handle it is to keep engaging until we finally thrash out what really happened and how to avoid anything like this happening again. I am glad you enjoyed Bath. It is a gorgeous city. Thanks for the positive mention for activism in the UK.
That's just plain insincere, Derrick. Your description of the 'no virus' debate is a gross mischaracterization. Nobody who knows the subject is saying that because SARS-CoV2 hasn't been isolated that means no viruses exist, and nobody is saying it means it's "all terrain theory". You're mixing issues that are completely separate, and making nonsense.
The 'maybe Cowan and Kaufman aren't real doctors' part is absurd. Maybe you should check into it, if it's an issue for you. But yes, they were both 'real' doctors, unlike most of the other's you've interviewed to ask about this subject. And if Cowan and Kaufman weren't medical doctors, would that mean they're wrong or would have less credibility? Popularity and establishment credentials mean truth, to you?
What's absent from you from the beginning on this topic is the willingness to use reason, and figure out who's telling the truth. And you display an obvious emotional bias to believe the Rockefeller medicine story about viruses, along with the crowd. Why not just admit feeling a strong bias and that you don't want to actually look at the science? That would be a sincere place to start.
Nobody who's really done the research on the side of virus truth is trying to bully anyone into just accepting the reality that no virus has ever been proven to exist. It's a call for reason, for science, and for truth, nothing else. You're taking the Kirsh approach and trying to steer the issue to being a popularity contest, in which truth always loses.
"Nobody who knows the subject is saying that because SARS-CoV2 hasn't been isolated that means no viruses exist, and nobody is saying it means it's "all terrain theory""
Actually, that is what many people say. This is the claim of so many other researchers who say viruses do not exist at all. I am not sure if you are seeing the same comments or videos I am, but I've heard that claim many times.
"The 'maybe Cowan and Kaufman aren't real doctors' part is absurd"
My comment wasnt about them specifically but the explosion of claimed doctors in the msm and in the independent media. I dont trust someone simply bc they have letters next to their name. No one should. I dont think thats controversial.
"And you display an obvious emotional bias to believe the Rockefeller medicine story about viruses, along with the crowd."
Show a statement or video where I prefer "rockefeller medicine". Make sure to include the Pyramid of Power episode where I specifically debunk and expose Rockefeller Medicine. However, that doesnt mean buying the claims of the no virus crowd wholesale.
"Nobody who's really done the research on the side of virus truth is trying to bully anyone into just accepting the reality that no virus has ever been proven to exist."
That's your opinion and that's fine, but my comments online and emails (and others' channels) show different. There are lists being made about those of us who are falsely accused of shilling rockefeller medicine (as you say) and trying to make this a divisive issue. I dont think it needs to be and I dont see it as the most important topic. End of story.
Who among the legitimate researchers of virology, who've looked at the scientific research and have concluded that no one has ever isolated a virus, are saying that the lack of SARS-CoV2 isolation proves there's no viruses? Provide one citation.
You continue to misrepresent and confuse issues, and as you persist in doing this it appears increasingly that it's intentional.
What Kaufman, Cowan, the Baileys, Lanka, and those associated with them do say is that they've looked at the past century of virology research and concluded that no one has legitimately, scientifically isolated any virus. That conclusion in no way comes from only looking at SARS-CoV2, as you've been claiming. Likewise, terrain theory has absolutely nothing to do with the lack of virus isolation; you're just adding more confusion.
You did specifically target your 'maybe they're not real doctors' comment at Cowan and Kaufman. Why didn't you mention that maybe people should question the credibility of Mercola, Fitts, Bigtree, and Corbett? Why didn't you ask them if they've actually read and understand the past century of virology research, so that your viewers know that you're soliciting uninformed opinions?
Virus theory and germ theory are the core of Rockefeller medicine. Establishing the fraudulent pseudo-science of virology was part of the core mission of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, set up by Rockefeller and Gates in 1901 in order to monopolize medicine around warring against nature and peddling toxic chemicals touted as health-care. If you're defending virus theory, you're largely defending Rockefeller medicine.
I don't care that you've had your mind made up from the beginning on this issue, and have no intention of sincerely investigating the science. What I do care about is your dishonest attempts to smear good people who have investigated the science, attempting to lead your viewers in that direction as well.
I'm attempting to discover if Derrick Broze has the character to get honest, and stop the BS campaign.
"if you're defending virus theory, you're largely defending Rockefeller medicine."
I've already said this several times and you don't appear to want to acknowledge it, but I am not defending virus theory. For the millionth time.
"Why didn't you mention that maybe people should question the credibility of Mercola, Fitts, Bigtree, and Corbett? "
Other than Mercola they dont claim to be doctors. That's the difference.
Look, I am not trying to argue. So chill the fuck out and breathe once or twice before typing up shit. I am not going to spend my precious time playing this game again with people who already have their mind made up.
In fact, behavior like this just pushes me away further from this crowd online.
You blatantly distort what Cowan, Kaufman and others say about virus isolation to insinuate that their position isn't rational, and when called on it you continue with the games and distort and deflect what I write. You didn't sincerely address a single of the questions I posed to you. Each of your responses avoids the points I've made.
"Behavior like this" is simply calling you on your misrepresentation and manipulation with hope that you'd get real. You poor victim.
I've been aware of your Freedom Cell work for years, and have loved seeing it. I wasn't wanting to find such an insincere response.
"You blatantly distort what Cowan, Kaufman and others say about virus isolation to insinuate that their position isn't rational"
Where? show me where I misrepresent either of these people?
You made several incorrect claims about what I do and say. Why should I take the time to refute the lies of someone who is being dishonest?
I attempt to have good faith discussions online but most of them results in stupid debates and arguments which go nowhere.
So, again, think what you like about me, whether real or imagined. It wont affect me or the trajectory of my work.
The first 12 minutes of your video is full of BS that misrepresents these people. Sure, you don't plainly say it. You do it with innuendo, like a sleazy mainstream 'journalist', so you can deny what you're doing.
I really didn't understand why you've had such a difficult time with the leaders of the virology truth movement, who are all very intelligent and courageous people, and none of them looking for a fight. Now I see why.
And I can see that you intend to continue undeterred, while never addressing the real issue; the honest science.
You interview people, but don't know (and verify) their credentials? Uhm ... this speaks volumes about you and your "research". You ask financial experts about whether or not viruses exist? Okay. Makes sense - don't believe medical doctors, but take the word of those who are in other trades. LOL.
Feel free to take anything out of context if you like. I know the credentials of the people I interview, I simply dont have them in front of me in this video. My comments were not about Cowan or Kaufman specifically, but the broader movement of doctors who have popped up in the MSM and in independent media. I am not blindly trusting of them just because they have a title next to their name or a lab coat on.
BTW none of the people who are speaking out as doctors as virologists.
Look up Stefan Lanka. He was a virologist and ended up leaving the field.
He did a control experiment of viral cultures.
One set had virus added, the others did not.
They had identical results, because of the toxic antibiotics and antifungals.
https://youtu.be/rgnoUGwxRDA
But feel free to ignore the points and focus on the politics in order to think you're objective.
I am aware of this work and I find it interesting.
Again, feel free to judge me or attack me or make assumptions, none of that matters.
At least try to stick to what I am actually saying and stop acting like I am afraid of looking at this or something.
By politics, I mean that instead of looking at the points made about virology, you instead focus on who is questioning it. Funny, that's the kind of thinking that the mass media promotes.
Mentioning that you don't see virologists challenging things, just remember this quote. It helps me understand why corruption persists, the system doesn't pay for the truth.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ― Upton Sinclair,
Check this study out about the Spanish flu. They tried many methods to pass it from sick people to healthy ones... A surprise ending to read
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
Re: Lanka
I'm just a bit frustrated that you know of his work, yet ignore the implications of his study.
Think about it again. If you get the same results from a culture with and without a virus, what does that tell you about the method and what viruses really are?
I definitely dont think people should just take virologists for the word. And I see the problems with contagion.
This just isnt my major focus. As the video above outlines, I am working on a report on the trans issue at the moment.
Ahh, now I understand.
You're a fence sitter.
You can't choose what makes the most sense.
You're waiting for the crowd to decide.
Haha
I'm not saying the people attacking you in the comments are on payroll, but if I was paying people to cause in-fighting and division this is exactly what I would instruct them to do
I'm really shocked by the nasty attacks on Broze below. No tact whatever.
I corrrespond with a very clever and knowledgeable man on substack and If I disagree I wouldn't dream of calling his ideas shit. I question and try out some of my ideas to see what he thinks.
Broze didn't get quite to the trans issue here. There has been a lot of hysteria on this subject and I am bored by it. People should be allowed to be what they want to be.
I am vaguely aware that some LGBTers try to work nasty politics into their status. They should be ignored