Should the public ignore the history of the Rockefeller Foundation as they shift resources towards promoting Agenda 2030 and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals?
Can we count on ol’ rajiv to ground all those nasty carbon polluting private jets flown by the “green agenda” group and when? Them first sweet checks! 🤔🤣
But therein lies another deception, as jet engines seem to only consume fuel to get them up to cruising altitude, and once there, the engines run on compressed air. But they would have you believe otherwise.
"The investigation is underway" I think it means that they want to fix for the public, in theory, the discrepance between the ideologies, what they promote today and the fact that eugenics and scientific racism affect people of color, people with disabilities and LGBTQ+ individuals. What else to do with the money they have than playing with people's lives....
Rockefeller foundation and the key players in the Eugenics movement have been claiming overpopulation is a problem for over a century. They always propose ways to fix it using eugenics in disguise and market it for the greater good.
Yes, my climate changed over the last few weeks from crappy to crappier. Halfway through spring and it's still the end of winter. Oh and Ro-Fo can go to the devil.
That’s the 33 million dollar question, isn’t it? How do they continually get away with it? And please, name for me one single tyrant that was taken down “by the people”. It’s never happened. Tyrants only get replaced when they get too big for their britches and step out of line with the controllers.
I would agree that some tyrants run their course and yes, the people are allowed to seemingly dispose of them, but as you point out, they are promptly replaced with another puppet. Same trick as “the vote”.
But how do they get away with it? I just watched a discuss on the trans thing with Piers Morgan and one of the defenders of the trans thing was a very beautiful, articulate, educated, block woman. And she seemed absolutely convinced in her position that the trans thing is legit, instead of a denial of reality, as her opponent was arguing. I know the whole thing is a ruse to move things forward - like if you want a rabbit, you ask for a pony - but still, how do you get an educated, articulate person to take that unrealistic position?
Can we count on ol’ rajiv to ground all those nasty carbon polluting private jets flown by the “green agenda” group and when? Them first sweet checks! 🤔🤣
But therein lies another deception, as jet engines seem to only consume fuel to get them up to cruising altitude, and once there, the engines run on compressed air. But they would have you believe otherwise.
"The investigation is underway" I think it means that they want to fix for the public, in theory, the discrepance between the ideologies, what they promote today and the fact that eugenics and scientific racism affect people of color, people with disabilities and LGBTQ+ individuals. What else to do with the money they have than playing with people's lives....
Rockefeller foundation and the key players in the Eugenics movement have been claiming overpopulation is a problem for over a century. They always propose ways to fix it using eugenics in disguise and market it for the greater good.
I uncovered all this doing research for my book.
Yes, my climate changed over the last few weeks from crappy to crappier. Halfway through spring and it's still the end of winter. Oh and Ro-Fo can go to the devil.
That’s the 33 million dollar question, isn’t it? How do they continually get away with it? And please, name for me one single tyrant that was taken down “by the people”. It’s never happened. Tyrants only get replaced when they get too big for their britches and step out of line with the controllers.
I would agree that some tyrants run their course and yes, the people are allowed to seemingly dispose of them, but as you point out, they are promptly replaced with another puppet. Same trick as “the vote”.
But how do they get away with it? I just watched a discuss on the trans thing with Piers Morgan and one of the defenders of the trans thing was a very beautiful, articulate, educated, block woman. And she seemed absolutely convinced in her position that the trans thing is legit, instead of a denial of reality, as her opponent was arguing. I know the whole thing is a ruse to move things forward - like if you want a rabbit, you ask for a pony - but still, how do you get an educated, articulate person to take that unrealistic position?
That again, is the 33 question.