My apologies - It was an unintended error on my part to comment on your comment. I agree with you.
My comment was meant for Broze who wrote at end that we could listen to the ‘real debate’ (or whatever the exact comment was) and he referred to Kennedy’s as practically the Am royals w/o noting their own rather criminal background so it sou…
My apologies - It was an unintended error on my part to comment on your comment. I agree with you.
My comment was meant for Broze who wrote at end that we could listen to the ‘real debate’ (or whatever the exact comment was) and he referred to Kennedy’s as practically the Am royals w/o noting their own rather criminal background so it sounded to me as if Broze was favoring RFK Jr. w/o also noting his standing with Israhel. He also referred to Trump as a criminal w/o mentioning any facts concerning the multiple unlawful law-fare cases. But I understand that such was not the focus of the post. While I agree with the principles Derrick outlined the writing is typical journalism which may feature many “truths” some facts and factoids but always mixed in with some garbage and lies. I’m not a Trumper btw, but favor fairness and labeling Trump as the mainstream media has (but not Biden bc they didn’t), is well, a lean too far for me, and to accomplish ?
Alright Derrick, that’s good and thx for the links. It just seemed a little bit like you were more on with RFK even though not promoting voting at all. I have not really followed you (time crunch); a friend sent me this post but I’m in your camp and I understand that none of the candidates on offer so to speak give us any real choice so why vote? I didn’t in 2020. I only vote in my local elections. And I understand Trumps presidency was not so good as ppl thought; like most selected corporate heads they give us a few “bones” and the rest are moves forwarding the global agenda. Local action is where it’s at. Keep up the good work!
My apologies - It was an unintended error on my part to comment on your comment. I agree with you.
My comment was meant for Broze who wrote at end that we could listen to the ‘real debate’ (or whatever the exact comment was) and he referred to Kennedy’s as practically the Am royals w/o noting their own rather criminal background so it sounded to me as if Broze was favoring RFK Jr. w/o also noting his standing with Israhel. He also referred to Trump as a criminal w/o mentioning any facts concerning the multiple unlawful law-fare cases. But I understand that such was not the focus of the post. While I agree with the principles Derrick outlined the writing is typical journalism which may feature many “truths” some facts and factoids but always mixed in with some garbage and lies. I’m not a Trumper btw, but favor fairness and labeling Trump as the mainstream media has (but not Biden bc they didn’t), is well, a lean too far for me, and to accomplish ?
not favoring him at all. Did you see my questioning of him on Israel a couple weeks ago? https://derrickbroze.substack.com/p/robert-f-kennedy-jr-questioned-about
Also, do you really know Trump? Check out this article I wrote at the end of his presidency:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/here-are-18-ways-trump-supported-the-swamp-during-his-presidency/
Alright Derrick, that’s good and thx for the links. It just seemed a little bit like you were more on with RFK even though not promoting voting at all. I have not really followed you (time crunch); a friend sent me this post but I’m in your camp and I understand that none of the candidates on offer so to speak give us any real choice so why vote? I didn’t in 2020. I only vote in my local elections. And I understand Trumps presidency was not so good as ppl thought; like most selected corporate heads they give us a few “bones” and the rest are moves forwarding the global agenda. Local action is where it’s at. Keep up the good work!
Local action is indeed where its at! Thanks