When a subscriber signs up for the receipt of information, that forms a contract with the platform to deliver (performance) the content. That contract exists between the platform and the signatory (subscriber), and is independent consent and acceptance. Any party that is not party to said agreement has no standing in the agreement. And as such interference with the agreement between the consenting party's is unlawfully denying the benefit of the contract to the consenting recipient in an agreement to which they are not a party. Makes sense to me. Anyone interfering is not upholding the obligation of good faith in commerce as is required under the UCC. AS ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY EVERY CORPORATE ENTITY. The contract is the highest form of agreement. A contract supersedes even the constitution. This is my understanding, Come to your own understanding. And as Ryan advises Question Everything. Good advise in my book
My bad, this comment was intended for the Sam Hussini interview.
When a subscriber signs up for the receipt of information, that forms a contract with the platform to deliver (performance) the content. That contract exists between the platform and the signatory (subscriber), and is independent consent and acceptance. Any party that is not party to said agreement has no standing in the agreement. And as such interference with the agreement between the consenting party's is unlawfully denying the benefit of the contract to the consenting recipient in an agreement to which they are not a party. Makes sense to me. Anyone interfering is not upholding the obligation of good faith in commerce as is required under the UCC. AS ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY EVERY CORPORATE ENTITY. The contract is the highest form of agreement. A contract supersedes even the constitution. This is my understanding, Come to your own understanding. And as Ryan advises Question Everything. Good advise in my book