Speculation: Seems like a concealed and effective maneuver to "pork barrel" the "bottled" water industry in Houston, possibly through un-justified city supplier contracts as well as general public intended mis-perception.
Question: was this maneuver enabled/accompanied by "kickbacks?"
Thank you,
Pat Baum
___________________________
from the journalism:
“I don’t think it was a formal decision,” she added.
The City of Houston has never publicly acknowledged they are not adding fluoride chemicals to the municipal water supply."
OF Course they never acknowledged, that would have been costly to the "bottled" water industry.
So, Wondering ~
Without a "formal" decision, no public acknowledgment would need be made. Resulting in no information or announcement to dispose all water consumers to believe their City supplied water was now suitable for drinking. Consumers of course would remain divided in their assessment as to the consequence of no added flouride water for drinking, cooking, showering. Some would regard this as a)harmful, b)of no health effect, or c)healthful.
A percentage of consumers in category c) would be those likely already to have made a market-safety decision to avoid drinking city water for self, family, business, and instead were purchasing and drinking "bottled" or otherwise-supplied water assumed to be safer (lower levels of flouride, no added flouride).
Were they supplied now with the Truth, a significant subset of consumers in category c) would cease paying for "bottled" water and return to using/drinking city water, now announced and known to be uncontaminated...
...Consequently at a measurable cost and loss of sales revenue to the non-municipal water industry.
By the concealing of the truth, sellers of "bottled" water could retain their market share, as deceived consumers would continue to "pay the price" to avoid what some still thought to be contaminated water.
How conveniently profitable to that industry for the city servants to remain mum.
Quite an unsupported "gift" to the water industry, a situation where payoffs for such mum behaviour could be contemplated.
Yay!! This is terrific. I had no idea. I have fluorosis on my teeth due to ingesting too much fluoride as a child. I never knew what the spots were on my teeth until a dentist in Houston told me what it was and what caused it. Now, whether or not my IQ was dropped because of the ingestion of fluoride, I'll never know. I'm not an Einstein, but I'm also not a dumbass. So, I guess a large majority of my IQ is still intact.
Geoff Pain PhD is on Substack so please look up his stack & feel free to discuss with him. His CV on the internet hides the depth of his knowledge in science, but he is of the genius caliber.
"Mechanisms of Fluoride Neurotoxicity A quick guide to the literature"
Help us advocate for the rest of Texas! How bout the whole country??? Nationwide ban on fluoride in our water. Stop the poisoning of U.S. citizens! Way to go Houston!!! Austin? Come on! Abbott? Get ur WEFFIE head outta ur _ss! 🥳
Dear Derrick,
Speculation: Seems like a concealed and effective maneuver to "pork barrel" the "bottled" water industry in Houston, possibly through un-justified city supplier contracts as well as general public intended mis-perception.
Question: was this maneuver enabled/accompanied by "kickbacks?"
Thank you,
Pat Baum
___________________________
from the journalism:
“I don’t think it was a formal decision,” she added.
The City of Houston has never publicly acknowledged they are not adding fluoride chemicals to the municipal water supply."
OF Course they never acknowledged, that would have been costly to the "bottled" water industry.
So, Wondering ~
Without a "formal" decision, no public acknowledgment would need be made. Resulting in no information or announcement to dispose all water consumers to believe their City supplied water was now suitable for drinking. Consumers of course would remain divided in their assessment as to the consequence of no added flouride water for drinking, cooking, showering. Some would regard this as a)harmful, b)of no health effect, or c)healthful.
A percentage of consumers in category c) would be those likely already to have made a market-safety decision to avoid drinking city water for self, family, business, and instead were purchasing and drinking "bottled" or otherwise-supplied water assumed to be safer (lower levels of flouride, no added flouride).
Were they supplied now with the Truth, a significant subset of consumers in category c) would cease paying for "bottled" water and return to using/drinking city water, now announced and known to be uncontaminated...
...Consequently at a measurable cost and loss of sales revenue to the non-municipal water industry.
By the concealing of the truth, sellers of "bottled" water could retain their market share, as deceived consumers would continue to "pay the price" to avoid what some still thought to be contaminated water.
How conveniently profitable to that industry for the city servants to remain mum.
Quite an unsupported "gift" to the water industry, a situation where payoffs for such mum behaviour could be contemplated.
Yay!! This is terrific. I had no idea. I have fluorosis on my teeth due to ingesting too much fluoride as a child. I never knew what the spots were on my teeth until a dentist in Houston told me what it was and what caused it. Now, whether or not my IQ was dropped because of the ingestion of fluoride, I'll never know. I'm not an Einstein, but I'm also not a dumbass. So, I guess a large majority of my IQ is still intact.
Point is you probably would have been an Einstein or Beethoven.
Maybe. Who knows. 😁
I cannot believe when I read the pushback & nasty vitriol re removing a known toxin from our water! It should be removed from everything!
We have been duped. Please feel free to read:
"9 out of 10 doctors recommend Camel cigarettes." Are you old enough to remember when doctors & scientists were paid to say this?
Sadly, you & the public have been duped. Please read:
"Kennedy, the Kook!"
https://open.substack.com/pub/flightjo/p/kennedy-the-kook?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Fluoride Finally Declared an "Unreasonable Risk"
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fluoride-finally-declared-an-unreasonable?triedRedirect=true
"Toxic Truths: Exposing Fluoride and the Legal Battle for Clean Water"
https://open.substack.com/pub/docmalik/p/313-zac-cox-toxic-truths-exposing?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Geoff Pain PhD is on Substack so please look up his stack & feel free to discuss with him. His CV on the internet hides the depth of his knowledge in science, but he is of the genius caliber.
"Mechanisms of Fluoride Neurotoxicity A quick guide to the literature"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312057754_Mechanisms_of_Fluoride_Neurotoxicity_A_quick_guide_to_the_literature
Help us advocate for the rest of Texas! How bout the whole country??? Nationwide ban on fluoride in our water. Stop the poisoning of U.S. citizens! Way to go Houston!!! Austin? Come on! Abbott? Get ur WEFFIE head outta ur _ss! 🥳